Beta
×

Welcome to the Slashdot Beta site -- learn more here. Use the link in the footer or click here to return to the Classic version of Slashdot.

Thank you!

Before you choose to head back to the Classic look of the site, we'd appreciate it if you share your thoughts on the Beta; your feedback is what drives our ongoing development.

Beta is different and we value you taking the time to try it out. Please take a look at the changes we've made in Beta and  learn more about it. Thanks for reading, and for making the site better!

Teen Cancels Party After 200,000 RSVP On Facebook

samzenpus posted more than 3 years ago | from the we're-going-to-need-a-bigger-hors-d'oeuvre-tray dept.

Facebook 191

autospa writes "An Australian teen who had to shut down an event page on Facebook after more than 200,000 people RSVP'd for her sweet 16 party now has more than 70,000 people signed up to attend her new party. The girl named Jess called police Monday to say her Facebook account had been hijacked after thousands said they'd attend her birthday party in Chatswood March 26."

cancel ×

191 comments

Sorry! There are no comments related to the filter you selected.

Hm (-1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510054)

Slow news day, uh?

Re:Hm (2)

mangu (126918) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510150)

Slow news day, uh?

I bet SHE is quite busy today!

Re:Hm (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510610)

It's a story involving Australia.

That guarantees it makes Slashdot these days.

Welcome to www.slashdot.org.au...

Re:Hm (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510856)

Not likely, Slashdot is a business not a charity; and therefore cannot have a .org.au domain
Australian domains are actually fairly well protected in this regard.

Re:Hm (2)

Miseph (979059) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511078)

Perhaps acting as though news happens in Australia is considered charitable?

Re:Hm (1)

mug funky (910186) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511010)

could be that it's australian work hours at the moment?

you'll get your turn.

News For Nerds (3, Insightful)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510058)

What the fuck has happened to this site? Yet another inane story that happens on Facebook is "stuff that matters"???

This place has really gone the tubes. It was once sort of cutting edge and look how far it has fallen.

Re:News For Nerds (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510092)

You missed the point. The 'news for nerds' isn't the Facebook hijinks, it's the party at a 16 year-old girls house.

C'mon, ya neckbeards! JB ahoy!

Re:News For Nerds (4, Funny)

MachDelta (704883) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510354)

16? Eh, that's really more of a 4chan thing.

Now if it was a LAN party... well! This is the perfect place to come for ideas on setting up a 100,000 client network!

Re:News For Nerds (4, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510586)

This is the perfect place to come for ideas on setting up a 100,000 client network!

two words.....token ring

Re:News For Nerds (2)

Americium (1343605) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510896)

It's more so that we all missed the invitation, because of the lack of a Facebook presence we have. Missing parties is what nerds are very good at, and this time a quarter million people knew about it before the nerds at slashdot did. At least now we can all complain about it and feel important once again.

Re:News For Nerds (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510724)

You missed the point. The 'news for nerds' isn't the Facebook hijinks, it's the party at a 16 year-old girls house.

No, you missed the point: it's the party at an Australian girl's house.

Re:News For Nerds (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511216)

Yep. Every non-event to occur in Oz inevitably winds up on /. now. It's like there are two countries in the world as far as /. is concerned --- USA and Australia. That's hilarious considering what a pissant place Aussie is, yet grab a few Aussie-lurvin' "editors" and next thing you know they're grabbing half your website. FFS, and RIP the sadly departed worthwhile Slashdot.

Re:News For Nerds (1)

mysidia (191772) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510900)

Makes you wonder how many RSVPs there woulda been, had a link to the party been featured on Slashdot.... oh, hmm, I guess Facebook would have gone down, due to the Slashdot effect, before it broke 5 million RSVPs

Re:News For Nerds (2)

ncgnu08 (1307339) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511490)

The story should be more about how these people have no idea when it comes to technology. I mean, what did she expect to happen? More likely, she never even thought about the obvious outcome, then goes crying when the obvious happens. If one wants to control how many people get invited to your party, maybe try sending paper invitations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedding_invitation [wikipedia.org] . I reference this link as proof they exist, which some might need to believe me. If ever there was a story for my "society" (see sig), this is it....

Re:News For Nerds (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511588)

I think you missed the point. Most of the stories here are now old news, badly referenced news, or stuff like this. Totally not worth reading anymore.

Re:News For Nerds (4, Funny)

MrEricSir (398214) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510234)

This place has really gone the tubes.

Has it gone a series of tubes, perhaps?

Re:News For Nerds (2)

ynp7 (1786468) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511172)

It accidentally the whole tubes!

Re:News For Nerds (2)

dragonhunter21 (1815102) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511556)

Tubular, man.

Re:News For Nerds (2)

Ant P. (974313) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511496)

This is just the latest in a series of tubes.

Re:News For Nerds (2)

religious freak (1005821) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510272)

Yeah, it's not the most interesting story, but I do find it vaguely interesting that anonymous (i.e. a random group of dudes not getting laid) would do this. Was this just a prank or perhaps trying to prove some kind of point. I think this would actually be a pretty interesting study of how the event would propagate to so many people.

At what point did this party reach the threshold between "why would I want to RSVP to this stupid thing" to "haha - it'll be funny if I say I'm going".

I would imagine the first five to ten thousand would be difficult. Even stupid groups like "I think this pickle is better than Nickleback" group had some unifying message/intention. I think pulling this off was something a bit different.

Re:News For Nerds (1)

Architect_sasyr (938685) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511118)

From what I saw over the past week, there have been a lot of status updates from random people I know (oddly, around the 20-25 mark and female mostly) going "who the fuck is jess, lol, well i'm going to her party". I doubt she was "hacked" at all, more like some people jumped on it.

Still can't believe this made it to slashdot, it was bad enough seeing it on my morning news.

Re:News For Nerds (5, Interesting)

sarysa (1089739) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510274)

As a nerd I think there's plenty of angles to this story...4chan's alleged "hijacking" of the event, the way the internet changes the dynamics of an open invitation event, but most importantly the way that the Aussie government is handling what most of us would consider a prank. It's also amusing to see how misinterpreted the notion of one's account h(ij)acked is by less seasoned users.

Also, it's very, very funny.

Re:News For Nerds (2)

grim4593 (947789) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511266)

The quote at the bottom of this site:
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re:News For Nerds (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511558)

Also, it's very, very funny.

Sort of like watching a train full of nuns plow into a truck full of penguins, yes.

Re:News For Nerds (1)

kyuubiunl (1747574) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510408)

This place has really gone the tubes.

Oh, you mean, This place has really gone down the tubes. Well to pay some homage to Mr. Carlin, 'It would seem to me, one country, one tube. But is every state all of a sudden have to have its own tube now? One tube is all you need. But a tube that big? Somebody would have seen it by now. "Hey Joey! Get a load of these *****' tubes!" '

Re:News For Nerds (1)

pirateRob (235363) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510876)

You guys are just jealous cause I got invited and you didn't. (also I am 15 minutes from her house I could have actually gone).

Now if that girl could get on TV and say our standard party host line: "I'll say sorry, but I wont take off my glasses", then we'd really have an internet sensation.

Seems like it's more of an event than the state election which will also be on that day.

Re:News For Nerds (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511148)

I don't get why everyone calls the police at what happens online. Just let your party happen. If nothing else, you can have a block party... Geesh.

Who's responsible... (3, Interesting)

Tigger's Pet (130655) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510066)

It says, in TFA, that "A 17-year-old boy was charged today for hijacking the invitation". I wonder what he has actually been charged with? Hijacking of an on-line invite seems a little over-exuberant by the Aussie police.

Re:Who's responsible... (2)

ron_ivi (607351) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510102)

If you read TFA, they also suggest that the hacker group anonymous is behind it.

Perhaps they hired HB Gary to do their research for them.

Re:Who's responsible... (2, Insightful)

MightyMartian (840721) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510130)

Ah, Anonymous. Self-righteous destructive fucktards of the world unite! "We'll piss in your pool to save you!"

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510222)

Pool's closed.

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510286)

Due to AIDS.

Re:Who's responsible... (3, Informative)

MooseMuffin (799896) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510490)

Good to see that after all the high profile stuff Anonymous has been linked to lately, they haven't forgotten to continue doing petty, immature stuff for the lulz.

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

Brad1138 (590148) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510700)

Ah, Anonymous. Self-righteous destructive fucktards of the world unite! "We'll piss in your pool to save you!"

And that was the last we ever heard of MightyMartian.....

I have wondered how many members of Anonymous are Slashdotters?

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511352)

I wonder how you define "member of Anonymous".

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

Brad1138 (590148) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511576)

I wonder how you define "member of Anonymous".

I assumed there is a member "list", so to speak, but that probably isn't the case at all. I guess anyone that knows what to do and how to do it and has participated in one of "their" causes would be a member.

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

mr_mischief (456295) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511768)

"We are legion. We are everyone. We are noone. We are not your personal army."

That doesn't sound much like a card-issuing chartered club to me.

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511358)

Anonymous in your Slashdot?, more likely that you think.

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511514)

Why the fuck would they come to this irrelevant site? Not even the GNAA post here anymore. :(

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510782)

Anonymous wouldn't piss in a pool. Infect it with AIDS, maybe.

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

mug funky (910186) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511036)

4chan's ocean of piss would be quite useful in Fukushima right about now.

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

ynp7 (1786468) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511190)

Pretty sure they piss in your pool for the lulz.

Re:Who's responsible... (2)

visualight (468005) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510962)

WTF. Now whenever anyone signs off with 'anonymous' it means they're part of some mythical group invented by the media.

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

Tigger's Pet (130655) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510110)

And, to make it worse, TFA seem to indicate that she shut the event down on FB after more than 200k people RSVPed, then created a new event which more than 70k people have replied to. Don't people ever learn? This is why evolution should dictate that she can't breed.

Oblig. XKCD (5, Funny)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510172)

http://xkcd.com/242/

I'm glad she can, indeed.

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510132)

Really? It's been a while since I watched Mad Max, but it sounds like the sort of thing Main Force Patrol would do.

Re:Who's responsible... (2)

JimboG (1467977) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510162)

He was charged with using a carriage service to harass - same as if he had called her up and abuse her. Fair enough I think.

Re:Who's responsible... (2)

cheekyjohnson (1873388) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510414)

Yeah. A weak-minded person's feelings might get hurt. Can't have that!

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

Stregano (1285764) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510256)

You guys sure that she just wasn't dumb and left the invitation open to the public and this dude just put it up on a blog or something? That sounds pretty damn reasonable.

OMG, BECKY! PONIES! (1)

TiggertheMad (556308) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510914)

She is the stupidest person ever for getting upset and canceling the party....I mean, Jesus, think of how many presents she would have gotten...

Re:OMG, BECKY! PONIES! (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511644)

No shit "i have moved the part to xyz and it is now 50 bucks a head unless I give you a ticket personally, OH and no present no entry"

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510290)

I may or may not have been aware of this was about to go down...

Anyway, no hacking involved. It was an open invite event that literally anyone could RSVP.

Re:Who's responsible... (1)

mangu (126918) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510294)

I wonder what he has actually been charged with?

Bringing Goatse candy [break.com] to the party.

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510370)

It wasn't actually the Girl's event that went viral. The boy created a fake profile, copied the event info and posted it in /b/. It's a slow news day.

Re:Who's responsible... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510438)

The kid is facing jail time for harassment using a carrier service

http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-party-invite-mayhem-youth-could-face-jail-20110316-1bwi3.html

He was later charged with using a carriage service (the internet) to harass/offend contrary to the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act, NSW Police said.

Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act, if a person is found guilty of the alleged offence the penalty is imprisonment for a maximum of three years.

Re:Who's responsible... (3, Informative)

Hecatonchires (231908) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511038)

He cloned the invite page and reupped it after she closed hers. Along with home address, phone etc.

From The Australian [theaustralian.com.au] Newspaper

A police statement released to Associated Press today said a 17-year-old boy had been charged with using a telecommunications carrier to harass or offend someone.

He is due in court in April.

I call BS (1)

theillien (984847) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510072)

Her account wasn't hijacked. Her parents found out about the party and put the kibosh on it.

Aussie Aussie Aussie (1)

spyder-implee (864295) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510074)

We have the fucking best parties!

Re:Aussie Aussie Aussie (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511508)

It's "We have the best fucking parties." It's the parties that are fucking, not the best that are fucking.

Who cares? (1)

aBaldrich (1692238) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510094)

1) Not news for nerds, and definitely not something that matters.
2) Solved simply by not allowing strangers; make a list of allowed people and anyone not on the list stays on the street.

Re:Who cares? (1)

HotfireXG (2012650) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510152)

I would say that it IS worthless. But you can't say it's not mildly entertaining to hear about (or tell someone else about).

Re:Who cares? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510158)

Then why you bother reading it , replying to it, and even geeking it out by writing point number 2?

Re:Who cares? (1)

Anonymous Showered (1443719) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510210)

And 3) No booze since it's an underage party. Why bother at all?

Re:Who cares? (1)

JaredOfEuropa (526365) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510346)

This is in Australia... what are the rules for underage drinking there? Oddly, in the USA they let you drive a car and buy a gun years before you are to be trusted with alcohol, but many European countries allow alcohol at 18 or even 16 (here in NL it's 16 for beers and alcopop, 18 for hard liquor). Then again, we can't get guns. Perhaps it's an either-or thing...

Re:Who cares? (4, Funny)

Pharmboy (216950) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510658)

To be fair, you really should have a few years experience handling a weapon before you try to do it drunk.

:D (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510910)

:D

Sometimes I wish /. had some sort of "turn this into a cosy joke exchange with that other fellow" button.

Anyway, consider this a ":D" from another Dutch guy!

Re:Who cares? (1)

isorox (205688) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511204)

This is in Australia... what are the rules for underage drinking there? Oddly, in the USA they let you drive a car and buy a gun years before you are to be trusted with alcohol, but many European countries allow alcohol at 18 or even 16 (here in NL it's 16 for beers and alcopop, 18 for hard liquor). Then again, we can't get guns. Perhaps it's an either-or thing...

Ahh America, you can get married, you can serve and die in foreign wars for your country, you can buy an assault rifle, but you can't have a beer.

Re:Who cares? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511422)

18 is when you can legally drink in Australia, get a full drivers license and arrange for a firearms license** and start the ball rolling to own a gun - All on the same day!

**If you under 18 you can have a firearms license but cannot have a gun registered in your name.

Re:Who cares? (1)

Anonymous Psychopath (18031) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510236)

1) Not news for nerds, and definitely not something that matters.

2) Solved simply by not allowing strangers; make a list of allowed people and anyone not on the list stays on the street.

She claims her account was hacked. The article says it may have been done by Anonymous, and 270,000 people you don't know with a 16-year-old girl's home address is a Bad Thing. It has some level of relevance to the /. audience as we all have an opinion about Anonymous, and we all have an opinion about privacy.

Re:Who cares? (0)

cheekyjohnson (1873388) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510484)

It sounds like she left the invitation open (the first one). That isn't their fault. Also, police intervention for an account being hijacked on the internet? Really?

Re:Who cares? (1)

Microlith (54737) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510506)

She claims her account was hacked.

Rather, she's looking for an excuse OR someone knows/guessed her extremely insecure password.

The article says it may have been done by Anonymous

OH NO, NOT ANONYMOUS.

and 270,000 people you don't know with a 16-year-old girl's home address is a Bad Thing.

More like, the vast majority of people don't give a shit and thought the huge number was amusing. Oh and I suggest taking your number out of the phone book, if people you don't know having your address is a bad thing.

It has some level of relevance to the /. audience as we all have an opinion about Anonymous, and we all have an opinion about privacy.

It's a garbage post of something that's happened quite a few times before. Someone creates an event, and shockingly their account security is at the default "everyone can see everything I do and post" resulting in the RSVP being visible to everyone on the fucking site. Some twit in the UK did it and ended up with 20K people RSVPing to a party. Not interesting.

Re:Who cares? (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511546)

Rather, she's looking for an excuse OR someone knows/guessed her extremely insecure password.

Insecure... you mean like 'MYTITZARETHELARGESTBESTESTMOSTAWESOMEINTHEWORLDZZ!!!!'?

Re:Who cares? (1)

masterwit (1800118) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511486)

Yes. The Southpark episode [southparkstudios.com] was much better even...at least that had a Tron reference!

Not news for nerds, geeks, or even someone outside of Australia. I mean what am I going to do...get a plane ticket to attend that party?!?! Let's be real here...

Obligatory (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510118)

http://xkcd.com/591/

Doesn't anyone remember Kate's party? (3, Informative)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510142)

It was less than spectacular. [encycloped...matica.com]

Re:Doesn't anyone remember Kate's party? (1)

IANAAC (692242) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510698)

Damn, that was a difficult page to read. Because I don't have ADHD, I guess.

What the Hell!? (1)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510160)

The party is cancelled!? I already bought plane tickets and a present!

Dear Moron Parents, (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510202)

Tell your ditzy daughter she is allowed to invite 20 people. No more, no less. She must make (herself) a printed list of the names. And she is not allowed to post any information about the party anywhere on the internet.

And she must (immediately) make her facebook account "private" so random people stop snooping on it.

SlashFACEBOOKdot, the new look (4, Insightful)

Nyder (754090) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510216)

Do we really need news about facebook every day?

I took a break from slashdot for a few years, came back a year ago, and seriously, this site is sucking even more now.

facebook is anything but nerd like. It's way too fucking popular. it's programed in a style most of us would never do, and honestly, the site probably offends most of us.

Unless the story is facebook crashes and burns and someone forgot to make backups, please spare us.

Seriously, fuck facebook and it's stupid news stories that shouldn't be on this site.

No, Fuck YOU SLASHDOT for being a lame fucking site these days.

News for nerds? You even know what a fucking nerd is?

Do you even know what NEWS is?

Re:SlashFACEBOOKdot, the new look (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510476)

its idle?

Re:SlashFACEBOOKdot, the new look (2)

dhall (1252) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510968)

This is the second ispyce article I've seen show up on Slashdot in the last few days.
I didn't think it was possible for an editor to be worse than kdawson...
The site is a known link spammer and the editors here should known better than to send them any traffic.

Re:SlashFACEBOOKdot, the new look (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35511006)

/. was never good

Time to find some alternatives (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510268)

for /.

Re:Time to find some alternatives (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510582)

Preferably a place where you get banned for life if you use the title of your post as the first line of your argument.

slashdot: news for birds, stuff that splatters (1)

PJ6 (1151747) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510282)

these times, they are a changin'

Ok. Where do i sign up. (0)

unity100 (970058) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510298)

This seems to be one of the rare hilarious events that may happen on facebook.

if anonymous was behind this, they just got a few more approval points in my book. its downright hilarious.

Life lesson (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510302)

A lesson learned at a young age - the Internet turns people into dicks. I'm sitting here wondering why 70,000 people would go along with such an irritatingly feeble prank, which basically amounts to filling in a form incorrectly, resulting in an administrative annoyance. Anonymous wins again. LOL.

I know! (4, Funny)

blair1q (305137) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510374)

Let's slashdot it!

Some actual news stories about this (3, Informative)

thehossman (198379) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510468)

If a random blogger is going to submission spam slashdot with all of his two paragraph blogs plagiarizing news articles, the least he could do is actually LINK to some genuinely useful coverage of the story on a reputable sites...

Re:Some actual news stories about this (1)

Jstlook (1193309) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510680)

Well that's the point though, isn't it? Some click-farm needs to boost its' credibility, so they grab real news and post it on their site, then submit those links to every website that might possibly link to their less-than-genuine-rendition of the real article?
It'd be nice if the editors stopped reposting these, but at some point of the heuristics suggest it's worth reposting (maybe they count how many responses each submitter receives?), maybe it's the heuristics that need to change.

Re:Some actual news stories about this (2)

Chuq (8564) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511090)

What? Herald Sun and Daily Telegraph are reputable sites now? :-O

Attention seeking whores... (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510676)

My girlfriend knows the girl, apparently she's an attention seeking whore. But every girl she knows is an attention seeking whore

She missed out (1)

CrazyJim1 (809850) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510822)

She should have said,"Bring your own food, and bring me a present if you can afford it." 200,000 presents could be interesting.

FB Event Invite Security? (2)

beerdini (1051422) | more than 3 years ago | (#35510974)

I quit Facebook a few months ago so don't really know if it is still the case, but back then I noticed that if someone you were friends with responded to an invite, even if that invite wasn't originally to "me" I could everyone who was invited and their comments to the event. It happened to be one of those "I forgot my phone number" events and I couldn't believe how many people just posted their phone numbers for anyone in the world to see. Let the friends that I actually knew know that their info was publicly viewable and they immediately removed it. Yet another case of people not knowing how little FB cares about your personal information.

If I had a chance.. (0)

Anonymous Coward | more than 3 years ago | (#35510978)

If I had a chance for one day in my life, to have a party where 200000 people showed up in the name of getting shitty and having an awesome party for MY birthday.....

13, 16, 27 or not. I'd do it. Regardless of the consequences, it would be worth it. Just for sake of being able to say for the rest of my life that it happened. Its a story to tell, and life is only but a collection a memories. So make them worth telling stories about right?

I know her (0)

Righey (1858564) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511536)

I know this girl IRL lol Whole school is talking about her ahahahah

lol (1)

thatskinnyguy (1129515) | more than 3 years ago | (#35511776)

I think you got some Idle on your front page.
Load More Comments
Slashdot Login

Need an Account?

Forgot your password?

Submission Text Formatting Tips

We support a small subset of HTML, namely these tags:

  • b
  • i
  • p
  • br
  • a
  • ol
  • ul
  • li
  • dl
  • dt
  • dd
  • em
  • strong
  • tt
  • blockquote
  • div
  • quote
  • ecode

"ecode" can be used for code snippets, for example:

<ecode>    while(1) { do_something(); } </ecode>